We read Plato's Dymposium in art and philosophy. Diotima (Socrates' 'teacher in the art of love') gives a sort of poetic argument about the nature of beauty:
1)Humans love
2)To love is wanting to posses the good forever
3)Humans are mortal
--------------------
Humans cannot achieve the object of love
1)Beauty is a good which last forever (or a long while)
2)Humans cannot achieve the object of love but strive after it
--------------------
In attempting to achieve immortality and union with the good humans create beauty
I feel there's a way to strengthen the inference in the second arguement, any thoughts?
I can never understand these types of conversations about love, and what it is, and if we can obtain it, etc etc. I guess I see this like religion, being that there are many types, and how can I say any one of those types is correct. Like love, who is right about it?
ReplyDelete